Now that was the rant of your basic political nutjobberdoodoohead with nothing salient or pertinent to add to any political discussion. Big deal.
He can hate and use words like Nuke 'em and crack and only the really politically blunted would find anything he said reasonable enough to make any effort perpetuating the hyperbole.
He is the right wing equivalent of the leftwing nutjob banging on a bongo and conjuring up welfare lines in his altruistic mind.
I say we put the two together in a room, let them argue, and hope they cancel each other out.
I thought he made some good points. Not that I'd advise he word it all exactly that way if asked to speak to the Ladies' Sunday School Class Garden Club and Sewing Circle... but there were good points. Only thing is that I disagree about only terrorists and liberals using the word "Zionist". I've noticed quite a few people self-identifying as Zionist because they do know what the word means and don't see a damned thing evil about it.
It wasn't funny, mostly because it was such a stereotypical rant that has as its source, an insane view that is actually extant.
I suppose if one encountered this view for the first time one would find it funny, but it is old and tiresome and pounds in the head like a tie-dyed hippy drum shouting "No war for oil!"
Same nutjobberdoodooism. Different sect.
The only thing relevant he said was that the leader of Iran is a nutter. Left and right spectrum sane people all agree on that.
There were some excellent points made and yes there was a ton of humor in it.
That was just a reflection of personality. Everyones sense humor isn't the same. I can see where it can come off sterotypical. I'd be the pot calling the kettle black otherwise.
7 Comments:
I was fine until I got to...
And who gave him a thesaurus anyway? You KNOW someone on that much crack cannot come up with a word like “aggrieved”.
... and then I died laughing!
Now that was the rant of your basic political nutjobberdoodoohead with nothing salient or pertinent to add to any political discussion. Big deal.
He can hate and use words like Nuke 'em and crack and only the really politically blunted would find anything he said reasonable enough to make any effort perpetuating the hyperbole.
He is the right wing equivalent of the leftwing nutjob banging on a bongo and conjuring up welfare lines in his altruistic mind.
I say we put the two together in a room, let them argue, and hope they cancel each other out.
Lordy lordy lordy...
I thought he made some good points. Not that I'd advise he word it all exactly that way if asked to speak to the Ladies' Sunday School Class Garden Club and Sewing Circle... but there were good points. Only thing is that I disagree about only terrorists and liberals using the word "Zionist". I've noticed quite a few people self-identifying as Zionist because they do know what the word means and don't see a damned thing evil about it.
I took it as humor.
Oh well.
It wasn't funny, mostly because it was such a stereotypical rant that has as its source, an insane view that is actually extant.
I suppose if one encountered this view for the first time one would find it funny, but it is old and tiresome and pounds in the head like a tie-dyed hippy drum shouting "No war for oil!"
Same nutjobberdoodooism. Different sect.
The only thing relevant he said was that the leader of Iran is a nutter. Left and right spectrum sane people all agree on that.
We'd get along just fine, loved it...
There were some excellent points made and yes there was a ton of humor in it.
That was just a reflection of personality. Everyones sense humor isn't the same. I can see where it can come off sterotypical. I'd be the pot calling the kettle black otherwise.
And it's 1:15 am. Eyes are crossed and leaving out letters. Catch you on the flip side bro and Semper Fi!
Post a Comment
Welcome back
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home