Disturbing post of the day
http://www.startribune.com/462/story/813803.html
Deer assault case presents unusual issues
Duluth News Tribune
Last update: November 15, 2006 – 4:21 PM
DULUTH -- Prosecution of a case involving alleged sexual contact with a dead deer may hinge on the legal definition of the word "animal.''
Bryan James Hathaway, 20, of Superior, Wis., faces a misdemeanor charge of sexual gratification with an animal. He is accused of having sex with a dead deer he saw beside a road on Oct. 11.
Not just any old deer, but a dead deer...
A motion filed last week by his attorney, public defender Fredric Anderson, argued that since the deer was dead, it was not considered an animal and the charge should be dismissed. "The statute does not prohibit one from having sex with a carcass,'' Anderson wrote. Judge Michael Lucci heard the motion Tuesday.
"I'm a little surprised this issue hasn't been tackled before in another case,'' Lucci said.
Leave it to an attorney to claim it's not animal rape if it's dead.
The Webster's dictionary defines "animal'' as "any of a kingdom of living beings,'' Anderson said. If you include carcasses in that definition, he said, "you really go down a slippery slope with absurd results.'' Anderson argued: When does a turkey cease to be an animal? When it is dead? When it is wrapped in plastic packaging in the freezer? When it is served, fully cooked? A judge should decide what the Legislature intended "animal'' to mean in the statute, he said. "And the only clear point to draw the line in that definition, I believe, is the point of death.''
I guess the lawyer boinks butterball turkeys and honeybaked hams on Friday nights...
Assistant District Attorney James Boughner said the court can use a dictionary to determine the meaning of the word, but it doesn't have to. "The common and ordinary meaning of a word can be found in how people actually use the word,'' Boughner wrote in his response to the motion. When a person's pet dog dies, he told Lucci, the person still refers to the dog as his or her dog, not a carcass.
"It stays a dog for some time,'' Boughner said. He referred to the criminal complaint, in which Hathaway told police he saw the dead deer in the ditch and moved it into the woods. Hathaway called it a dead deer, Boughner said, not a carcass.
So... Hathaway is driving along and sees a dead deer, and becomes aroused to the prospect of buggering said deer so he drags it off into the woods to have relations with it... simply mind boggling.
"It did not lose its essence as a deer, an animal, when it died,'' he said.
Anderson argued that the statute, which falls under the heading "crimes against sexual morality,'' was meant to protect animals. That would be unnecessary in the case of a dead animal. "If you look at the other crimes that are in this subsection, they all protect against something other than simply things we don't like or things we find disgusting,'' he said. Other crimes in that subsection include incest, bigamy, public fornication and lewd and lascivious behavior.
Boughner said the focus of the statute was on punishing the human behavior, not protecting animals.
I think the guy should be publicly humiliated if that is possible. Going to jail probably isn't the best outcome for dead deer fucker.
"It does not seem to draw a line between the living and the dead,'' he said.
Interpreting the statute to exclude dead animals would also exclude freshly killed animals, Boughner said. That, he said, could lead to people who commit such acts with animals to kill them. Lucci said he would render a decision by Hathaway's next court appearance on Dec. 1. The misdemeanor charge carries a maximum penalty of nine months in jail and a fine of up to $10,000. If convicted, Hathaway could serve a prison term of up to two years because of a previous conviction. In April 2005, Hathaway pleaded no contest to one felony charge of mistreatment of an animal for the shooting death of Bambrick, a 26-year-old horse, to have sex with the animal.
I see...a repeat offender. The guy apparently only gets a stiffy for the dead ones.
I changed my mind. This guy needs to fry. What a sick bastard!
Labels: People in the news
25 Comments:
And to think that there are many like that on this planet.
I'm rarely at a loss for words, but.....'holy shit' is about all that springs to mind at the moment.
This is a fine example of what I think is wrong with our system... we focus on revenge, rather than protection. The issue should be that a man sick enough to screw a dead deer doesn't have any business wandering freely through our society. Instead, it becomes an issue of there's nothing to punish him for if the deer was already dead and didn't suffer.
Have I mentioned lately that chopping the heads off of stupid people would qualify as mercy killings?
Cripes Ham~~ I learn something new everyday... mind if I stay blissfully ignorant for the rest of the day??? What do we need to write a law about next?? No fucking in the Meat dept. @ the grocery??
Sorry I need a censor **oops**
lol it's ok cheesy, colorful language is actually required here.
I fucking can't even finish reading this just now. I am living in Wisconsin. AND I cite this article as the main REASON why I am single and dateless here. I am surrounded by morons...
I think it's safe to say (being that I live among them and all) that people 'round these parts will claim: If you can eat it, you can fuck it.
no pun intended
ok, i HAD to read the last paragraph... now I need to go puke.
and move to a different state.
PLEASE make sure there is a new post here when I come back...
sick sick sick
And who is the woman who shall have sex with that guy afterwards??? I assume he didn't use condom when he had sex with the deer.
Not to dismiss the stupidity of the lawyer in this case, I feel the need for a small rant on the projectors of our legal system. Leave it to a lawyer to go find the loophole as to whether this was a deer or not simply because it was dead.
"Lawyers, they are like nuclear weapons. They have theirs so I have mine and when you use 'em you fuck up everything!" - Lawrence Garfield of "Other People's Money"
Flyinfox_SATX
What happened good old castration?, leave them with constant frustration and by no means be 'medical' about the 'amputation.
It's only a misdemeanor & it was dead.& you want to cut his balls off for it?? That's a little severe? or chop off the heads of morons? you guys are scarey over here.
How would you like try to keep a straight face in that courtroom?
But is he a vegetarian?
I guess for him a visit to the butcher shop is like someone else going to a porn show.
Makes my skin crawl...
He shot a horse so he could fuck it? And he faces only misdemeanor charges? Did anyone even bother to question his freedom to walk among us in society with those types of behavioral tendencies? I bet he DOES fuck his dinner before he cooks it, the sick bastard. I wonder who is going to be at his trailer for thanksgiving.
l>t So you are ok about him frying but not his balls ? I was joking about the chopping off bit but shit he shot a horse purely for sexual gratification, I am all for all kinds of sex but kids and animals is a big no no and shooting to fuck animals ??? well then we dont need to do any quantum physics to know theres no telling what this guys next kick is.. Nip it in the bud..and by all means if that incorporates some kind of injection then so be it...
I'm guessing they probably won't be making a beer commercial about this man... "Here's to you dead deer f*cking guy..."
This was in Minnesota, correct?
Well, they *did* just elect the first muslim to Congress, so why am I not surprised.
That's just beyond sick. This guy gets a misdemeanor, but you can't charge a guy for a b.j. Just wrong.
Horse? did i miss something? I thought it was a deer that was already dead!
Judith: i just read the part about the horse.*sheepish grin* (shows how long my attention span is)
Yes officer. I killed old Bessie for the hot dead horse sex...
Somebody throw this guy to the hogs.
Just to clarify, I didn't mean we should chop off the deer fucker's head. No... I think he's a very ill person who could perhaps benefit from some professional help. My problem is that his lawyer is trying to find a technicality to get him off the hook on this one, when it'd probably do his client a lot more good if he encouraged him to go get the professional help, maybe even filed a plea to have any sort of sentence suspended if the guy checks into a mental hospital. And I think it's really sad that we have a system that pushes things to this point. When people see the system as a means of punishment instead of a means of protecting society, they'll do whatever they have to in order to avoid being punished.
His lawyer is being stupid on this, and it just encourages my belief that killing stupid people would be putting them out of their misery. Everyone does stupid things sometimes, but I don't see how chronicly stupid people could truly be enjoying life. What's this guy's lawyer going to brag about later? "Oh, I once got a deer fucker off on a technicality. It was so fulfilling to see him head out into the woods looking for his next hot date..um... cold date." Really, is that a life to feel good about?
Thats an interesting take Phoenix.
As with most anti-social sexual maladies and predelictions there is no cure save death.
This is what makes pederasts so dangerous.
Wow, Now I'm going to have every google seach for Deer fucker pointing to this blog.
Why did the man have sex with the freshly killed doe?
Did you see how she was field dressed?
ok bad joke
Incidentally, The Deer Fucker was also a 1979 low-budget porn sequel to The Deer Hunter (I think).
This guy is NOT from Minnesota. This is being associated with my home state because Minnesota papers covered it. Apparently the Wisconsin papers didn't consider it newsworthy. Too common, perhaps?
Other notable Wisconsinites:
--Child killer Ed Gein
--Skull fucker Jeffrey Dahmer
anon: Strange how that works. looks like nobody wanted to claim him
Post a Comment
Welcome back
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home